Chapter 6
CESAP JOIN THE SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT
carelessness and inattention seen before mercilessly qualify the Research Center of the journalist professor of marketing. With " Committee Contacts Electromagnetic " engaged in the chorus of the Resistance, the quality of material produced by CESAP certifies the degree of scientific credibility.
Possibly the most striking about the group Arkeon, whose ten-year study, Dr. Tinelli mena particular pride. On site states that this study is the work:
" of Dr. Lorita Tinelli, who has collected over the past decade a number of testimonies and documents, developing a thick dossier .
is also emphasized that this collection and study would have aroused such an interest to require the creation of a specific e-mail. Presumably to avoid overloading the normal inbox, already clogged by a " huge number" of requests for help :
" E 'was for this reason an open box Write
then at specific [...] segnalaciarkeon@fastwebnet.it .
From these ten years dedicated to the study of Arkeon - if not the only, certainly the largest group studied by CESAP - one would expect:
- a substantial amount of published material (for " participate actively in the development of science " )
- that the section on Arkeon ( a " exemplary case of 'psycho' in Italy ") is the most thorough.
- is not one of Tinelli or any associate of CESAP;
- even one is a study or research.
The ten-year collection of testimonies and documents for processing " a thick dossier " , served with Dr. Tinelli for bragging rights to participate in a program, quickly listed in its curriculum. However, they did produce a single search, only one study, nor any document published by CESAP. Nothing. ( " participate actively in the development of science " )
Sul forum del CeSAP un ex di Arkeon, Tiresia, racconta la propria esperienza. 
Con un copia-incolla il racconto si è trasformato in 14 documenti/studi.
Ancora un paio di considerazioni:
- quei dieci anni - verosimili - spesi per l’elaborazione di un solo dossier, testimoniano quanto siano inverosimili i 247 misteriosi e anonimi dossier sui “ gruppi specifici ” fantasma del solo 2002;
- la Tinelli scrive di aver consegnato il dossier su Arkeon a “ Digos, Guardia di Finanza e Questure ” , senza però pubblicare niente; se del suo lavoro possono beneficiare solo gli organi inquirenti ma non la scienza, anziché fondare un centro studi avrebbe fatto meglio a creare un’agenzia di volontari della sicurezza, le cosiddette ronde.
As each of the topics discussed above, also the case Arkeon alone is limited to the credibility of CESAP, but in addition to these 16 papers / studies, there are others 189. Their rapid examination will reveal other aspects that we can define it mildly inappropriate to science.
Nell ' article " psychological dependence on destructive cults " , just below the title reads " of Lorita Tinelli " written in bold characters higher than those used for the title. Below, in small, says: "From 'Toxic Faith', pp.139-157 Steven Arterburn. The text is in the list of elements that characterize a pathological faith taken from the book by Arterburn. The brief introduction written by Dr. Tinelli (65 words, including articles, conjunctions, book title and author's name), is sufficient to give her the title of "study". Plagiarism, which perhaps explains how it was possible to produce - in a single year - a whopping number of " 247 dossier " .
" ... alla dottoressa Lorita Tinelli , [enfasi nell'originale] psicologa clinica, grafologa, criminologa, docente e presidente del CESAP Centro Studi Abusi Psicologici, centro che effettua accoglienza, sostegno e consulenza a vittime di culti distruttivi e totalitari e che cerca di combattere la manipolazione psicologica operata dalle sette. "
fa sorgere il sospetto che a far decidere per la pubblicazione, più che la qualità del documento sia stata l’apologetica citazione.
Sempre in merito a Scientology va segnalato anche un episodio che ne testimonia la malinconica incompetenza. Intervistata per un’ inchiesta giornalistica sulla Chiesa americana trasmessa da Current TV, con due strafalcioni mostra di non conoscere neppure le nozioni più elementari di questo gruppo:
- pronuncia il termine auditor come viene letto in italiano da chi non conosce l’inglese ("Au Ditor" rather than " or Ditor"), that error would not who has never even conversed briefly with a Scientologist;
- between the mind control techniques used by Scientology cites only one, the bombing love, which is probably the only one of these techniques not to be used in this group, which considers compassion mental aberration and openly repudiates the tenderness. The bombing love is to Scientology, such as condoms to Catholic doctrine.
Someone must have already raised the embarrassing contradiction of a Research Center that produces studies, for always on its website Tinelli writes:
" All articles (except those from press release), contrary to the way in distorted reports, are written by our staff or by persons to whom we express request (we have all the documentation to be able to prove it!) "
To Christian charity omit " we have all the documentation to be able to prove it! ", the reason we'll find out soon. Let us dwell instead on the categorical statement that " All articles published " CESAP are produced by or drawn from outside at the express request of the association. Note that the " express request " authorization does not refer to the publication (which is not mentioned), but the realization of the studies: " are written by [...] people to whom we express request ".
is probably the statement that best describes Tinelli, but step by step. In previous chapters we have seen that Dr. Tinelli has a conflictual relationship with the Italian. In a gesture of magnanimity could then appeal again to " hypothesis benevolent " : Tinelli suppose that would express the opposite of what he writes and the express authorization request relates to the publication . This is a hypothesis that the same is at pains to deny Tinelli, prefacing his proclaims that " is not true that [the site of CESAP] simply take material of various groups, mostly already published ". This premise makes it clear that the 'express request "is not about copyright: " All articles published " are original, not " already published ".
After inclusion in the Order of Journalists, the interactive CD-ROM combined with the book, published research from universities and elsewhere. at this point is not only shake his head disconsolately. On 205 published documents and those attributable to CESAP counted on the fingers of one hand. The rest is previously published material, almost always online. With a look of Grandma's Corsaro Nero, Tinelli is holding an apple and says indignantly its truth: this is a cat.
few examples. Article " Homeopathy: the art of selling water " , Roberto Vanzetti, has been published on Science and the paranormal and is well dated. It is 1997, two years before the birth of CESAP. Same goes for " THE DBM (DYNAMIC BUSINESSMANAGEMENT) ", which was published in the journal of the GRIS back in 1992 when she was a student Tinelli.
CESAP production can not be - directly or indirectly - not the other 9 articles published in journals, as well as nine in the press, which would certainly better placement in the "Press". And if in a gesture of generosity wished to raise them to the rank of "My Documents" (unrealistic for a study center that participates " actively in the development of science ) , then it should be noted that have been copy-pasted from site of COURIER SALUZZO (without putting the rightful link to the site), from L'Arena di Verona , etc..
Ownership also not credible to the songs taken from " Psychotherapies Fools" in 1996 or " Cults in Our Midst " the 1995 American psychologist Margaret Singer, or a text Steven Hassan of 2,000. Extracts should be a contribution to the scientific development of CESAP.
aside the unreasonable claim that the material produced at the request of CESAP, is incomprehensible to the inclusion in the Documents and Studies of a Pastoral Note of the CEI, or press release Archdiocese of Modena-Nonantola, or the two communicated the Curia Diocese of Conversano, among other 10 (ten) press releases. From
pedantry of press releases or a " stenographic report " (s ghost appears only the title page) of " parliamentary session No. 828 " , descend into a leaden bureaucracy with the lengthy statute of Jehovah's Witnesses, which is followed by the interminable Memorandum prepared by the Jehovah's Witnesses " Dr. Giandomenico Cardelli, notary in Rome, with offices in Via ... ". Same consideration for the " Statute of the Neocatechumenal " , which is preceded by " final status of the Neocatechumenal " . If they are deemed important documents (certainly not for the " development of science " ), you face the special section "instruments of incorporation and statutes."
section " Neocatechumenal " there are three items attributable to finally CESAP. In this case it is a collaborator, Felice Scaringella , " Student 1st year degree course ... " Certainly the young Felix has written three valuable (albeit short) articles and is now the esteemed dr. Scaringella, but its contribution is the most relevant material produced by an association that claims to be a reference for judges, lawyers, police, social workers, doctors, psychologists, sociologists, teachers, educators and the rest of the famous group . An excessive burden to bear in solitude for a first year student at the university. However, it is a most important contribution to scientific study of the hypothetical , which boasts the participation of Dr. Tinelli a transmission Maurizio Costanzo (unless you consider a document on the vanity).
In summary, the Documents and Studies section is composed almost entirely of previously published material, 188 to 205 91% (see . NOTE 1). Of these, 83% (at least 157 pages to 188) was taken with a hasty cut and paste from other pages web, generally with no indication of the site of origin, and is dotted with banal lyrics (for a study center) as:
- a YouTube video in Portuguese (no subtitles in Italian) ;
- three interpellations;
- the Boccaccio story " Pornoprofessoresse and teachers who are driven " ; of this paper does not indicate the source or the site from which you copy-pasted, a forum, for the most is copied with particular ineptitude: a whole paragraph was inserted after the end of the text after the signature of the author (also the same tangle here), the entire text is underlined and has the usual foolish and font changes etc.
- items that do not have the slightest bearing on psychological abuse as " The Administrative Officer in local government " , taken from a site that is not mentioned, how little relevant to the themes of CESAP you can tell from the presentation that makes it a more site: "The author makes a detailed survey of the figure of the official working in local government, capturing the distinctive features and peculiarities and especially the regulatory profiles "
- 's interview with Dr. Tinelli of CESAP " created by Aquiloneblu " (which in reality is called Blue Kite) and ' interview with Nicole Bressan kite made from Blue CESAP (interview but is inexplicably signed by the interviewer herself, which makes usually think of the hasty and clumsy copy-paste);
- 's announcement that the Order of Psychologists of Tuscany has won a court case, news of exclusive corporate interest;
- the aforementioned deeds, statutes, permanent status, Notes pastoral, press releases, etc..
CESAP The interview with Nicole Bressan same signed by the interviewer. Among all this material presented in a botched, low value non-existent information and scientific value, the studies attributable to CESAP are very few. Besides the already mentioned three articles of the student to 1 year and the suspect interview with Nicole Bressan Bressan signed by itself, it seems there are 17 more just.
summary: ten years of operation, of which in 2002 alone, 247 stores " studies carried out by our consultants " to discover that of the 205 articles ( " All " CESAP or produced by people who the CESAP did " express request " ) only 21 documents appear to be produced by the association. But instead of a depressing result, one should speak of farce, because between these apparent 21 contributions to the development of science, many should be deleted and the real number is more than halved.
commencing work firmati dalla ricercatrice giornalista, che sono 14.
1. “ Genesi e motivi dell’espansione delle sette ” ;
2. “ Le sette : problemi terminologici ” .
Sono due estratti (uno breve, l’altro brevissimo) della sua tesi di laurea, del 1996, tre anni prima della nascita del CeSAP. La ricercatrice barese ha quindi l’abilità di moltiplicare un singolo elaborato in 5 onorificenze e non in 3 come scritto nel 2° capitolo:
- a university degree to which the text was written;
- a " study " that the University La Sapienza university would publish but which is not ;
- a book kept in the garage in five boxes;
- Article " Genesis and expansion of the seven reasons " ;
- Article " Seven: terminological problems " .
4. " Techniques of persuasion and the mechanisms of induction .
are two excerpts from " Tesina " of course which has " formed " in criminology in 1999, before the birth of CESAP. Even this "thesis" has miraculously created a "study" and an article. However, all published exclusively on its website.
5. " Dependence psychological in destructive cults "
is the work of bricolage which we mentioned above, and signed " of Lorita Tinelli " for putting a ' introduction of the transcription of some 65 words Steven Arterburn pages.
6. " Features totalitarian groups.
Still the hobby of DIY . Having put before a brief introduction to three pages of a book by Hugo Stamm, would make become the author of the study.
7. " Accession group of Jehovah's Witnesses: How and Why "
This we have already met in Chapter 1, It is the paper delivered at a conference del GRIS nel febbraio 1999, prima che nascesse il CeSAP. L’impaginazione è stata presa con un copia-incolla da un sito che però non viene citato.
8. " EFFETTI DELL'ADESIONE AI TESTIMONI DI GEOVA SUI MINORI ”
Anche questo è già stato trattato nel 1° capitolo: è lo “studio” che nel 2000 la Tartarina di Bari ha appeso al muro della sua cameretta visto che nessuno l’ha pubblicato. Benché irrilevante, va considerato una produzione del CeSAP.
9. " Le sette e la famiglia ”.
Come gli altri è un lavoro vecchissimo, del 28/11/1999. Inseriamo pure questo nel conteggio della produzione CeSAP, benché sul valore di questo breve scritto deve nutrire dei dubbi persino l’autrice stessa: è l’unico a non comparire nel suo enciclopedico curriculum analizzato nel 1° capitolo, il quale riporta persino la partecipazione a una trasmissione di Radio TAU.
10. " Suicidi di massa: alla ricerca della verità assoluta ”
Nuovamente una vecchia conoscenza del 2° chapter. This is the surface of the researcher wrote Tinelli, that "Managing Director" of the magazine Labyris, Lorita Tinelli, decided to publish with the consent of the Relay Committee. Even if trivial, consider that even in the count.
11. "How protect the psychological profession by quacks? "
is the jeremiad in which the Mediatrix Family Counselor accused of abuse of the psychological profession. As the ad the court case won by the Order of Psychologists of Tuscany, this Corporate claim may only affect members of a profession, eager to counter the competition from other professionals, but it is off topic about the problems of psychological abuse.
12. " The Parental Alienation Syndrome "
A pearl. In a text editor takes up two pages. The first opens with two quotes, and everything else is surprisingly the same - word for word - to ' article Parental Alienation Syndrome "by Dr Annamaria Tupputi published Psicopedagogie.it. On the second page, which excerpts from the Bible, the Watchtower, by Margaret Singer and two other researchers, it is argued that: in cases of separation, if one spouse is a Jehovah's Witness and the other not, the parent belonging to JW discredit in the eyes of children the other spouse with the support of the group. And he says because she can boast that " Very often I happened to act as technical advisors, in cases of separation " . End of article. Science thanks.
13. " Correspondence case of suicide Vinci .
is a document written for four hands. This is an exchange of e-mail between Tinelli and the family of a young man who committed suicide. This family please e-mail to request the removal of some press reports which he said distorted the story. Dr. Tinelli reply asking if he wants his e-mail to be published on the site. Perhaps one of the best work of the consultant-journalist, but included in the production of studies produced by CESAP a request to publish an e-mail is not really possible.
14. " Abuse psychological and mental control "
L’ennesima nostra conoscenza del 2° capitolo, ma è pertinente, quindi va considerato valido. Merita una visita per ammirarne l’impaginazione.
Eliminando dal conteggio il materiale non attribuibile al CeSAP perché scritto prima della sua fondazione, e i lavori di bricolage per una questione di decenza, il risultato finale è di soli 4 articoli. Nessuno classificabile come studio e sul cui valore è comunque meglio soprassedere (anche sul definirli “articoli” ci sarebbe da discutere). La partecipazione attiva del CeSAP allo “sviluppo della scienza” è della stessa natura della sua “ organizzazione distribuita the national territory ".
Let those who, at first glance, appear three documents produced by other employees of the association. This is a comment Achilles Aveta " the program 'The kidnapped daughter' " and two papers (one of 2000 and one of 2001) of the late Maurizio Antonello, which is defined " Aris Consultant - Veneto " and " Founder and Vice-President CESAP " :
In the bottom of the comment Achilles Aveta, is reported (unique among the 205 published documents) the specific " Copyright © 2005 - Psychological Abuse Research Center. All rights reserved ". We take it as true even if the text is freely given by other sites and update the total in 9 of the writings of production CESAP. The other two documents published on the website a few years after the untimely death of dr. Antonio in 2003, their attribution to CESAP deserves a clarification. The assignment is clear: the qualifications of " Vice-President CESAP " and " Founder " leave no doubt. But this is nothing new: it is the first and only time that Dr. Tinelli give up his role as founder of CESAP and allow other the title of "Founder " without putting itself in foreground. Just remember his resume, which states " founded CESAP " and not " is co-founder CESAP of . Or consider the case of another founder member of CESAP, Belisario Dongiovanni, which when mentioned outside the state are attributed to the qualifications of Secretary or Treasurer, never a founding member. This unexpected concession to the dr. Antonello is not unexpected that repentance recommended a more sober, but it is a temporary sacrifice for a more robust functional CESAP same award at the two documents.
Back to dr. Antonello. It is true that he encouraged and helped the then newly graduated Lorita Tinelli CESAP to base, but when this happened he was more than a decade and the mind - along with Milena Bolgan - the heart and soul of ARIS, and remained so until his death in 2003. It can be said that Maurice "was" the ARIS. Identification, without violating the contribution of other members of the association Veneto (Mario Martini, Emanuela Fontana, etc..), Derived from its undisputed leadership and his total dedication to the association. Which is why, if there is an association that can boast with the studies of Mauritius, this may not be the association that embodied, ARIS, and certainly not the CESAP.
The appropriation of these two studies by the CESAP, it is therefore specious and morally questionable. Same is the questionable moral status of " Aris Consultant - Veneto " , sad attempt by Antonello CESAP to downplay the link-Aris to make ours a "noble father" who now can not deny.
In conclusion, when Dr. Tinelli argues that " is not true that [the site of CESAP] simply take material of various groups, mostly already published " , is once again disregarding an obvious reality. The material already published by someone else is almost all of the documents / published studies, el'avverbio " mostly " is even an understatement. He also ridiculed the smile slip that he had written in uppercase " TRUE " - as in an unconscious confirmation - rather than its negation "not" . Mischievous anecdotes aside, the fact remains that to be magnanimous instead of a Study Centre should talk about a sloppy material container-together on the issue of belief. Belief and sectarianism, for "documents" as the list of Marian apparitions are beyond the scope of psychological abuse. Stesso discorso per l’elenco delle scuole che rilasciano titoli accademici non riconosciuti in Italia. Una definizione meno indulgente, sostituirebbe “contenitore di materiale” con “accozzaglia”.
Rimane un ultimo studio da considerare, lo “ studio multidisciplinare sull’abuso ” pubblicizzato da oltre un anno, che incomprensibilmente non è disponibile on-line. Per leggerlo bisogna contattare “ la signora Gabriella Ferrigno alla segreteria del CeSAP: cesap@libero.it ” :
The first oddity is that Mrs. Gabriella meet at cesap@libero.it Ferrigno, Dr. Antony Blanc, dr. Sergio Labini, Dr. Mary and Dr. Lorita Tinelli Capital. You suspect that you are using a heteronomous or nominee for a non-existent claim of personal wealth that crowd the offices of CESAP.
But back to study. After the announcement that the magazine was suppressed Labyris to continue the publication of material on the site of CESAP, it is indecipherable, the unwillingness to use the web for this phantom study. Elusive as the obscure choice not to publish on the site becomes less impenetrable if I am thinking back to the first chapter where we saw the non-existent CD-ROM that Loffredo Editore has never attached to a draft. Trying to take the study " multidisciplinary " via email or directly to Dr. Tinelli by phone, you get one or more of the following results:
- no answer;
- required to specify the reasons for interest in the study;
- required to specify the qualifications that justify the interest in the study;
- required to specify the purpose for which will be used;
- the answer is not available because it reprint (one year);
- the answer is not possible to give vision because it is considering the idea of \u200b\u200bmaking a publication.
Analyze the senselessness of these answers would be bloated. The scientific research and data it produces are made to be disclosed, not to sit hidden in the mattress as the savings of farmers of long ago. People who try to disseminate research to include as much as possible, so that a researcher shows his ability and is credited in the scientific community (and contributes to progress). Those who have nothing can only reproduce the material found on the Internet, groped to pass off their own research materials of others or invent non-existent.
In closing this chapter, a curiosity that might entitle Strange but true.
Avete letto bene, nel 2000 il CeSAP ha indetto un concorso per le “ vittime di violenza ” . Avrà vinto il partecipante che ha subito più angherie? E da chi era composta la giuria, da un team di qualificati aguzzini? Sfortunatamente la dr.ssa Tinelli non ha più menzionato questo strambo concorso, forse perché impegnata a organizzare quello per le vittime di stupro.
Continua . . .
0 comments:
Post a Comment