Reason 3 Cd 2 Orkester Sound Bank

4 - The numbers of Cesap

Chapter 4

FIGURES CESAP

After the professional qualifications of Dr. Tinelli, we come now to the social journalist, researcher, expect for the network is realized in CESAP. Because of its association with the Dr. Tinelli gives the numbers, and numbers are very happy, we start from these. It will not lose the humor.

This is one of several annunci che appaiono a rotazione sul sito del CeSAP, coi quali si tratteggia un’associazione dinamica e articolata, che oltre a produrre studi e ricerche, gestisce una grande quantità di richieste d’aiuto.

Dopo aver visto il curriculum e le pubblicazioni della giornalista docente di marketing in un corso per parrucchiera, accettare sulla parola le sue dichiarazioni è imprudente. Meglio provare a fare due conti. Per pietà glissiamo sugli archivi su cui è “ Tutto documentato e registrato ” e ci soffermiamo sul solo “ centinaio di richieste al giorno ” , una quantità that defines itself Tinelli " huge " .

consider only the canonical five days per week basis, Monday through Friday, and consider only 11 months a year, to grant a holiday to the whole structure. There remain 239 days working. We remove a few more party-controlled and limit ourselves to 230 days. Other than " huge " , you get a stratospheric 23,000 requests for help each year.

How many requests for help can get to an association which is psychological abuse? We make a comparison with similar association, Telefono Azzurro. Simile nel senso che anche Telefono Azzurro, come il CeSAP, si occupa di abusi, non certo per quanto riguarda la struttura, la capacità di comunicazione e la conseguente notorietà. Difficile trovare qualcuno in Italia che non sappia dell’esistenza di Telefono Azzurro. Al contrario, quasi la totalità degli italiani non ha mai sentito parlare del CeSAP, il che lo rende non commensurabile a Telefono Azzurro.

Il confronto è reso possibile da questa pagina di Telefono Azzurro, dove troviamo il totale dei casi gestiti dai suoi due call center (Milano e Palermo), attivi 365 giorni l’anno, 24 ore su 24. Il dato fornito da Telefono Azzurro per l’anno 2008 è: 3.230. Uno striminzito 14% since CESAP. The hyperbolic figure of 23 000 requests for help by boasted Tinelli is unlikely as the story of Dumbo the Flying Elephant. Discard the deliberate falsehood, the only plausible explanation is that Dr. Tinelli sees it as " requests for help " with receiving spam email.

Also on requests for help, there is another statement that makes one believe that the tendency of CESAP creative accounting is present from birth. There una pagina che pubblica i dati relativi alle richieste di aiuto pervenute nel 1999, l’anno della fondazione del CeSAP, avvenuta in giugno:

Nel 1999 abbiamo avuto 758 contatti di cui :

• 423 richieste di aiuto concernenti sette religiose o pseudopsicologiche


• 315 richieste di aiuto per violenze intrafamiliari


• 40 richieste di aiuto nell'ambito lavorativo (mobbing).

is even unpacked the total, which is 778 and not 758, but we come to the plausibility of these figures. The CESAP is little known now, ten years after his birth, let alone in the first months of its founding. Why is it credible that the foundation received more than 6 CESAP the requests for help per day, is necessary to assume that the victims were already in line outside the house of "journalist" Tinelli, waiting for her would create a study center.

course, that these numbers are written to the event tells us the logic, there is no evidence. But there is a very knowledgeable person to confirm publicly that things CESAP statistics to be invented. This is the Dr. Lorita Tinelli, which in this article in its of 2001 gives a completely different version of the data for the year 1999:

• abuse at home: 125 (instead of 315)


• abuse in the workplace: 140 (instead of 40)


• abuse in context of worship: 436 (instead of 423)

be noted that " locations" of CESAP - the plural - as if to indicate

that in addition to the Walnut in 1999 there were others.

Tinelli The spin doctors reported a total of 763 people would turn to CESAP. Bingo! Second Addition, according to blunder: the sum of 125 + 140 + 436 is 701. Evidently, in addition to difficulties with the Italian, he has also with elementary arithmetic. Back to

page with the official data of 1999. Inexplicably, these 778 requests the first 6 months of life CESAP are higher than those of all 12 months of 2000 (total 454) and 2001 (total 626). Impossible not to consider the numbers written in an imaginary case to claim success. The date of entry of the statistics makes it hard to believe the report of 1999. For the years 2000, 2001 and 2002 are placed at the end of the year in question, for 1999 you remember to publish the data six years later. A strange anomaly:

statistics 2000 - posted December 12 2000

year 2001 statistics - posted December 12 2001

year 2002 statistics - posted December 29 2002



year 1999 statistics - posted November 28 2005

Finally, a curiosity. The number 758, which is the total (wrong) Contact declared for 1999, must be a particularly pleasing to Dr. Tinelli: unbelievably is exactly the same total of 758 declared for the year 2002 . An amazing coincidence:

In 2002 we had 758 contacts in:

• 542 requests for help on religious sects or pseudopsicologiche


• 201 requests for help to intrafamily violence


• 15 requests for help at work (mobbing).

Also on the page with the data of 2002, there are two other interesting statements:

• " Library CESAP of 2453 has come to include texts. "


• " in 2002 were followed 238 degree and specialization. "

Ancora il brutto vezzo di usare parole inappropriate. “Seguire” una tesi di laurea, è come quel “ formata in ” che abbiamo visto all’inizio. È un termine che in ambito accademico non significa niente. Di una tesi si può essere il relatore o il co-relatore, altre funzioni non esistono. Perciò anche la dichiarazione secondo cui esponenti del CeSAP (che vedremo si contano sulle dita di una mano) sarebbero stati relatori o co-relatori di 238 tesi (una al giorno for every working day of the year), contrary to logic as the flight of the tender Dumbo. Even on the

" 2453 texts " , it is worth saying a few words. A well stocked library is rightly a source of pride - if it really exists. In a brochure dated 09/10/2007, the photography, the library of CESAP, which according to legend, " includes thousands of books and documents " .

Detail of the brochure

Just a quick look and the mind conjures up images of the baobab Tartarin Tarascon growing in a pot: two poor shelves, one half-empty, and only bins on the shelves. of " thousands of books " you have never seen even one. Mercilessly, check out here to do the math. If in 2002, just three years after its birth, the library already contained CESAP 2453 texts, it is logical to believe that in 2007 the " thousands of books " are many more. However, the hypothesis Atteniamoci " benevolent " (neglecting the " worried "), ie the estimate as low as possible, and limit ourselves to these three hypothetical " thousands " books. I measured the space occupied by 50 books, choosing the shelf in my library that contains publications smaller: 113 cm. Applying the same proportion to 3,000 books, you get a result greater than 67 meters, spread over 5 shelves as the shelves of the picture, employing over 13 meters of wall. The shelves of the photograph must have a width of about one meter, for a total two-meter wall around the workers. Missing eleven meters of shelves (in addition to missing all the books).

Arithmetic aside, we have a person who publishes a photo of a rack containing binders and claims to see thousands of books. A loss of touch with reality that gives rise to concern. But this we must add the CD-ROM interactive non-existent, the false statement to be admitted to the journalists, publications ever published, has collaborated with the newspapers for which he never wrote, and so on.

Other than the baobab Tartaric only a meter high. Here the reality is thrown with the stubbornness of a visionary Don Quixote, who sees a flock of sheep an army of Moors. To find an excuse to misrepresent these books, you must use a logic very bold: postulating that when he writes, "The Library " Dr. Tinelli should say "Part of Library ", we can assume that the eleven feet of shelving remained missing boundary. But I think that could be contemplated only as a child who believed in the story of Dumbo.

Continue